Get Adobe Flash player

Author Archive

Trending Now: #TBCP

If palliative care was a business one could say it is in the midst of a brand crisis. (See my earlier post- The Conversation Stopper). Luckily the brand is both evolving and expanding as healthcare reform germinates in the US. Also recently the #HPM and healthcare literature in general appears increasingly peppered (in no small thanks to Dr. Ira Byock) with aspirations to ‘the best care possible’. I worry that this sound bite will rapidly become a cliché and lose its oomph. I hope it won’t. Read the rest of this entry »

Life Left

“Would I be surprised if Mr. X died in the next 12 months?”

Packed with humanity this question is a powerful prognosticator according to the limited literature on the Surprise Question (heretofore aka SQ). And there is the rub. Prognostication is such a poor science that we have come to rely on a combination of intuition, experience and ahem, surprise or lack there of! Don’t get me wrong-prognostication clearly helps with planning treatment, setting goals where time may be short, focusing on the care of the patient, not the disease. However when it boils down to a hunch, a sixth sense of an individual’s impending mortality I feel that, for the entire exponential tech wherewithal of the 21st century, we should be doing better. Or should we?

“A year is a long time for a sick person”. This is the astute observation of a lay co-worker when I tried to explain the concept of the SQ. His reactions were illuminating. “Obvious, commonsense, anybody can make this judgment,” were some thoughts he proffered. “Why not ask the nurses? They have more contact (with the patients) than doctors do. Why not split it into 3 month periods?” Rich stuff indeed! I tried to reason that the SQ does not ‘give’ someone a year to live; my conclusion is it functions as a clinician’s probabilistic guesstimation that an individual may pass any time within the next twelve months.

It got me thinking how the SQ could evolve:

  • What other rich information can be gleaned from clinician perspectives on how well or otherwise their patients are doing? What is the concordance/discordance between providers?  How congruous is the clinician perspective with the patient’s?
  • Can we stratify surprise e.g. mild surprise (oh, really?), moderate surprise (no, you’re kidding!)  and whopping (OMG I don’t ####ing believe it!! -drops cup) surprise?
  • What can we learn from the “false positives” i.e. those individuals who died whose death did surprise you and why?
  • What about those clinicians who are never surprised? At anything, because of burnout maybe or because they have an innate pessimism, cue “realism”, cue fatalism? Maybe they would be better off in a different vocation.
  • Are some clinicians better than others when it comes to the SQ? What variables in a clinician’s experience determine how accurate their SQs are? Duration, fellowship training, IM vs. FM, international grad vs. American, age, previous career? PCP vs. specialist vs. Palliative care provider?
  • What about asking the individual themselves? Would you be surprised if you died in the next 12 months? Why not? Would your family be surprised?
  • Spouse /other family members? Is it too emotive? Can it be done gently in the context of a larger conversation about the future? Could it help an individual and their families confront and perhaps acknowledge one’s mortality and, in effect, gain ground as a useful concept when prioritizing life left?

Ultimately though what bothers me most about prognostication is…. prognostication. It gives no perspective on how well someone is living or dying or existing in the luminal space between. Let us focus on this and the surprise will take care of itself.

 

I Have a Confession.

I have a confession. I recently started Tweeting (@drnickyquinlan). Here are my top 5 newbie tips on leaving (or is it joining?) the nest. Read the rest of this entry »

The Wellness Visit

Too often are seen in the ICU or in the emergency room middle aged or older adults with some chronic illness(es) who are incapacitated with a catastrophic event. Then, frequently in the absence of documented/voiced advanced directives, it is left to the healthcare proxy (if previously assigned) in combination with (other) family members and the medical team to guide the care plan. It struck me that knowing an individual’s values and preferences (expressed to a neutral party) on how they wanted to be cared for if seriously ill are undoubtedly beneficial in situations where difficult choices have to be made. Read the rest of this entry »

The Conversation Stopper

So there I am, watching my kids playing in the local playground, new to the locale, trying to form my own social network with other parents of young children. It is all very chatty and amicable until the topic of employment comes up… “And what do you do?” “I work in palliative care. (Silence) Have you heard of it?” Read the rest of this entry »

Through the Therapeutic Window

Through the therapeutic window comes in a shard of light. And in that light is hope, is bliss, is warmth. And a suggestion of an opening into a place that is kept hidden oftentimes from oneself and then can only manifest through others. Read the rest of this entry »

Social Media is Now!

Recently I have noticed more postings to departed loved ones on their anniversaries of passing. It appears to be a novel way of professing out loud one’s grief and love for family or friends who have passed on. Read the rest of this entry »

The fine line between son-in-law and doctor-in-law: by Nicky Quinlan, JPM Fellow-in-Training Columnist

Daisy is 68. In the past few years, she has experienced life with a neurological condition causing progressive functional decline, pain, visual impairment and other indignities. Surprisingly to me, she cut a rug into the wee hours at my sister’s wedding in Ireland recently. Other days, she sleeps a whole lot and needs much assistance with mobility and ADLs from her loving, dedicated spouse, Abe. Her spirit remains strong, however. Daisy is also my mother-in-law. Read the rest of this entry »
Can We Talk?
Watch and share this five minute video about the need for prophylactic end-of-life conversations. Laura Heldebrand, an ICU nurse tells her mother's story.
High Traffic Alert !
Your JPM blog is a high traffic site. We have 1406 subscribers. In August 2012, we had 140,372 hits (this number is excluding bots and spider traffic)! Many thanks to you all for your love and support of your Journal of Palliative Medicine.
Get Involved: Build Your JPM Network
Please become an active member and a local leader of the JPM Social Media community. Ask your friends and trainees to sign up for the free, full-text JPM blog posts.

Do email us now and take a hand in shaping your favorite palliative care journal, be it as a user, a local chapter advocate or panelist. We are waiting to hear from you.
Subscribe Free: JPM Updates
JPM Community Chatter
Follow this JPM Blog
Archives
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011